– Virtual machines add more overhead to the developers’ hardware – Difficult to roll updates out to the team, adds an extra step to each developer’s workflow
Go VirtualĬreate virtual machines for each project environment. Especially if they don’t make sense for their business.
#DOCKER FOR MAC SLOW UPDATE#
– Could work, but likely isn’t realistic, as few clients will stick around if there is no flexibility on the technologies and update schedules.
#DOCKER FOR MAC SLOW UPGRADE#
– Easy for developers to forget to switch stack techs between projects Be Draconian on Update Cyclesīasically force the same Stack and upgrade cycle on each client at the same time – Difficult to maintain and ensure all members of the team are on the most up to date versions. + Gives developers easy ways to switch up their tech stack Maybe just create scripts for php, nginx, varnish, elasticsearch, which allow switching versions on the fly As project requirements change, these need to be easily and quickly applied to all development environments to ensure all current project work and testing is done against the currently used technology. The ideal setup would be a system by which all developers can easily change their current working stack to match what currently is in production for each project. Fragmentation sets in, and ultimately can lead to the dreaded “well it works on my machine, but not on the production server” bug. As the number of projects grows and evolves, the ability for a development team to keep their development environments in sync with what is currently in production for each project becomes a challenge. This can be simply explained by differing upgrade cycles between each project and which technologies are available at the time of launch. Like with many agencies, client projects can vary drastically in their technology requirements, ranging from nuanced to large differences between the default tech stacks. Worse still, this ideal consistent developer setup is often abandoned or ignored due to the constant maintenance required, with most developers just reverting to using a stack that “just works” on their machine.įollow on to see how C3 tackled this problem with some encouraging results. Setting up local environments for each of your team so they may easily switch between using differing stacks can be cumbersome, and prone to fragmentation, as updates to one developer’s setup might be forgotten and not passed on to other members of the team.
But what happens when you have a team which doesn’t all work on the same hardware or OS? To complicate things more, what if you have multiple projects, all with varying technical stacks, like different versions of Varnish, PHP, Nginx, etc.
0 kommentar(er)
